AWS 2Q14 and why the sky is not falling

Amazon posted weaker 2Q 2014 results for Amazon Web Services, leading some to speculate about competitive pressures despite continued enormous growth in usage.

Investors are asking, probably reasonably, what’s going on here. Is the overall market for cloud computing weakening? Are competitors taking more market share? Or is this largely the result of the price cuts that went into effect at the beginning of 2Q? And if it’s the price cuts, are these price cuts temporary, or are they part of a larger trend that eventually drives the price to zero?

The TL;DR version: No, cloud growth remains tremendous. No, AWS’s market share likely continues to grow despite the fact that they’re already the dominant player. Yes, this is a result of the price cuts. No, the price cuts are permanent, and yes, cuts will eventually likely drive prices down to near-cost, but this is nevertheless not a commodity market.

The deep dive follows. Note that when I use the term “market share”, I do not mean revenue; I mean revenue-generating capacity-in-use, which controls for the fact that prices vary significantly across providers.

What’s with these price drops?

I have said repeatedly in the past that the dynamics of the cloud IaaS market (which is increasingly also convergent with the high-control PaaS market) are fundamentally those of a software market. It is a market in which customers are ultimately buying IT operations management software as a service, and as they go up-stack, middleware as a service. Yes, they are also getting the underlying compute, storage, and networking resources, but the major value is the actually in all the software that automates this stuff and delivers it as an easy-to-consume, less-effort-to-manage solution. The automation reduces a customer’s labor costs, which is where the customer sees cost-savings in services over doing it themselves.

You’ll note that in other SaaS markets, the infrastructure is effectively delivered at cost. That’s extremely likely to be true of the IaaS market over time, as well. Furthermore, like other software markets, the largest vendors with the greatest breadth and depth of capabilities are the winners, and they’re made extra-sticky by their ecosystems. (Think Oracle.) Over time, the IaaS providers will make most of their margin off higher-level services rather than the raw resources; think about the difference between what a customer pays for Redshift data warehousing, versus raw EC2 compute plus EBS storage.

The magnitude of the price drops is scaring away many rival providers. So is the pace of innovation. Few competitors have the deep pockets or willpower to pour money into engineering and data centers in order to compete at this level. Most are now scurrying to stake out a niche of the market where they believe they can differentiate.

Lowering the price expands the addressable market, as well. The cheaper it is to do it in the cloud, the more difficult it is to make a business case to do an on-premises solution, especially a private cloud. Many of Gartner’s clients tell us that even if they have a financially viable case to build a private cloud right now, their costs will be essentially static over the amortization period of 3 to 5 years — versus their expectation that the major IaaS providers will drop prices 30% every year. Time-to-value for private cloud is generally 18 to 24 months, and it typically delivers a much more limited set of features, especially where developer enablement is concerned. It’s tough for internal IT to compete, especially when the major IT vendors aren’t delivering software that allows IT to create equivalent capabilities at the speed of an AWS, Microsoft, or Google.

The size of the price cut certainly had a negative impact on AWS’s revenues this past quarter. The price cut is likely larger than AWS would have done without pressure from Google. At the same time, the slight dip in revenue, versus the magnitude of the cuts, makes it clear that AWS is still growing at a staggeringly fast pace.

The Impact of Microsoft Azure

Microsoft has certainly been on an aggressive tear in the market over the last year, especially since September 2013, and Azure has been growing impressively. Microsoft has been extremely generous with both discounts and with free credits, which has helped fuel the growth of Azure usage. But interestingly, Microsoft’s proactive evangelism to their customers has helped expand the market, particularly because Microsoft has been good at convincing mainstream adopters that they’re actually late adopters, spurring companies to action. Microsoft’s comprehensive hybrid story, which spans applications and platforms as well as infrastructure, is highly attractive to many companies, drawing them towards the cloud in general.

Some customers who have been pitched Azure will actually go to Azure. But for many, this is a trigger to look at several providers. It’s not unusual for customers to then choose AWS over Azure as the primary provider, due to AWS’s better feature set, greater maturity, and better ecosystem; those customers will probably also do things in Azure, although they may be earlier-stage and smaller projects. Of course, many existing AWS customers are also adding Azure as a secondary provider. But it may well be that Microsoft’s serious entry into this market has actually helped AWS, in terms of absolute usage gains, more than it has hurt it — for the time being, of course. Over time, Microsoft’s share gains will come at AWS’s expense.

The Impact of Google

Google has been delivering technology at an impressive pace, but there is an enormous gulf between its technology capabilities and its go-to-market prowess. They also have to overcome the perception problem that people aren’t sure if Google is serious about this market, and are therefore reluctant to commit to the platform.

While everyone is super-interested in what Google is doing, at the moment they do not seem to be winning significant customers from AWS. They’re doing reasonably well in batch-computing scenarios (more as a rival to AWS spot instances), and in scenarios where all of Google Cloud Platform, including App Engine, is of interest. But they do not seem to have really gotten market momentum, yet.

However, in this market and in many other markets, a competitor does not need to win over the market leader in order to hurt them. They merely need to change customer expectations of what the price should be — and AWS has allowed Google to set the price. As long as Google seems like a credible threat, AWS will likely continue to be competitive on price, at least for those things that Google also offers. Microsoft has already publicly pledged to be price-competitive with AWS, so that pretty much guarantees that the three providers will move in lockstep on pricing.

The Impact of Smaller Providers

Digital Ocean, in particular, is making a lot of noise in the market. They’ve clearly established themselves as a VPS provider to watch. (VPS: virtual private server, a form of mass-market hosting.) However, my expectation is that Digital Ocean’s growth comes primarily at the expense of providers like Rackspace and Media Temple (owned by GoDaddy), rather than at the expense of AWS A Digital Ocean droplet (VM) is half the price of an AWS t2.micro (the cheapest thing you can get from AWS), and they’ve been generous with free-service coupons.

VPS providers have friendly control panels, services that are simple and thus easy to use, and super-low prices; they tend to have a huge customer base, but each customer is, on the average, tiny (usually just a single VM). These days, VPS is looking more and more like cloud IaaS, but the orientation of the providers tends to be quite different, both from a technology and a go-to-market perspective. There’s increasing fluidity between the VPS and cloud IaaS market, but the impact on AWS is almost certainly minimal. (I imagine that some not-insignificant percentage of AWS’s free tier would be on VPS instead if not for the free service, though.)

There’s plenty of other noise out there. IBM is aggressively pitching SoftLayer to its customer base, but the deals I’ve seen have generally been bare metal on long-term contracts, usually as a replatform of an IBM data center outsourcing deal. Rackspace’s return to its managed hosting roots is revitalizing. CenturyLink continues to have persuasive sales. VMware customers remain curious about vCHS. And so on. But none of these providers are growing the way that AWS and Microsoft Azure are, and both providers are gaining overall market share at the expense of pretty much everyone else.

The sky is not falling

With Microsoft and Google apparently now serious about this market, AWS finally has credible competitors. Having aggressive, innovative rivals are helping to push this market forward even faster, to the detriment of most other providers in the market, as well as the IT vendors selling do-it-yourself on-premises private cloud. AWS is likely to continue to dominate this market for years, but the market direction is no longer as thoroughly in its control.

Posted on July 28, 2014, in Industry and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. Good comments. I would draw one nuanced but significant distinction around your premise that cloud IaaS is “fundamentally” a software market: it is software but with the cost of hardware. I agree that software is the key value differentiator in the marketplace, but the cost structure of cloud IaaS and software are totally different. To be a cloud IaaS provider, you not only have to invest in software development, you also have to invest in the raw infrastructure to enable your software. And that is not cheap at all. Datacenter space, power, cooling and hardware CPU, storage and networking, even utilizing commodity hardware, is extremely expensive. Plus all those physical assets have a useful life which means you are on a constant replacement treadmill (3-5 years for compute/storage, 7-10 years for power systems, 10-15 years for HVAC, etc). So unlike a pure software business (e.g, VMWare, old MSFT) that can leverage the accumulated investment in software at very little margin cost, this is not the case with Cloud IaaS companies like AWS and GOOG that must constantly dump billions of dollars into raw infrastructure. In a way, these companies are no different than datacenter companies like EQIX and (OMG) old school telcos that are destined to spend 15%-25% on revenue on CAPEX forever. Or to use Nicolas Carr’s analogy, a power company.

    Being a cloud/datacenter provider myself, I think AWS can cut pricing because on a bundled basis their service *still* has a lot of margin built in. That is a good thing overall for the market and why guys like Digial Ocean and Linode can still make money selling $5/month VMs.

    Anyone who thinks AWS will turn into a $10B cash cow like MSFT Office is in for a long wait.


  2. I absolutely agree on the continued capex spend. Note that SaaS companies also do not have the margins of traditional software vendors.


  3. Your website must provide a clear message which has a goal-oriented direction, setting you apart from your
    competitors. This business will probably be operated in the owner’s home and will likely be done
    entirely around the internet. ll possess the practical guidance you
    may need on how to begin a concierge business”.


  4. Quality articles is the key to attract the people to visit the website, that’s what
    this website is providing.


  5. Hey would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re using?
    I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most.
    Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a honest price?
    Thank you, I appreciate it!


  6. Unquestionably imagine that that you said. Your favorite reason seemed
    to be on the internet the easiest factor to take into account of.

    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people
    think about concerns that they plainly do not know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also outlined out the entire thing with no need side-effects ,
    other people can take a signal. Will likely be
    again to get more. Thanks


  7. Providing you are a Director or employee of a company, these payments
    are an allowable deduction against the Corporation tax liability of the
    company. In the previous section, I offered up three questions you must use as a focal point when creating a business model.
    Most limousine companies have a fleet of vehicles of all shapes and sizes.


  8. I find that the IaaS market is very similar to the current hosting market. There are a number of larger players that will continue to draw a huge amount of clients, but they are always going to be playing defense against companies with better service and more specific focuses (ie Magento, WordPress, and other tailored hosting solutions). Right now AWS obviously has to defend against Google and Microsoft, but the smaller providers are also impacting their business. I think when you look at providers like DigitalOcean, Linode, and, we’re definitely seeing companies that can impact the bottom line of places like AWS over the long haul.


  9. In the past 25 to 30 years old when he was elected governor of Chukhotka, and it’s flat-out disrespectful and disingenuous to suggest we can’t.
    Nonetheless usually there are holdouts; Nascar country, Pintinho said he gave a
    yeoman’s shift until he was right. The story top eleven hack was published, the world.
    Dexter top eleven hack controlled the ball in the night-cap.
    It is like to provide security at games.
    During soccer training drills, here are the old’ soleplate.


  10. Once the digital camera is installed on your own network it is possible to open your web browser for example Internet Explorer
    and type inside the IP address 192. Installing a property
    surveillance camera system within your home which is accessible using the
    Internet is currently a rather straightforward, inexpensive
    and simple proposition. School security cameras can deter such
    activity or record what of criminals since the take place.

    The Wireless Home Security Cameras are actually common being applied in commercial use and by the government for surveillance in a
    entity and area. It is the technology of integrated
    home security camera systems that you pay for once you buy one.


  11. Business cards are pretty much one of the standard commercial printing products that
    practically every business and professional avails of.
    In the previous section, I offered up three questions
    you must use as a focal point when creating a business model.
    Business loans tend to carry a high rate of interest.


  12. Put them in an area where they will stay at room temperature, for four weeks,
    and your babies will be ready. This one simple act can save you energy and money on your
    electric bill. And occasionally outside packaging is also accomplished in form
    of cases of cardboard or some specific materials.


  13. Great information. Lucky me I discovered your site by accident (stumbleupon).

    I have saved it for later!


  1. Pingback: Amazon Cloud Luster Fading? Look Closer – InformationWeek | Everyday News Update

  2. Pingback: Amazon Cloud Luster Fading? Look Closer – InformationWeek | Headline News Extra

  3. Pingback: IWM | ¿Se opaca el brillo de la nube de Amazon? Mire más de cerca

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: